Scope map

Cost of AI Automation
development in Canada.
I know you want to build ai automation.
There are 10 lakh+ agencies, 5 crore+ vibe coders, and 1 crore+ developers out there right now. You found this page anyway. That's not an accident, we're still the best of all of them at what we do.

We're Sachin and Arjav. We started this studio together, and we still personally work on every project that comes in. When you reach out, it's one of us who replies, not a support team. And we'll say it straight: bring us your toughest deadline or the idea three other agencies said no to, that's exactly where we do our best work. We're Indian founders too, so don't stress about the budget upfront, tell us what you've got on a call and we'll figure out what fits.
Forget the price tag for a second.
Tell me your actual budget, not what you think you're supposed to say, and I'll tell you honestly what we can build in it. No stretch quote, no upsell.
Ask five studios what an AI Automation costs in Canada, and you will get five different numbers. That is normal. It usually just means nobody defined the scope yet. As a simple guide, ₹30,000–80,000 gets you a real MVP to test your idea. ₹1.5–4 lakh gets you the full version most businesses actually launch with. ₹8–20 lakh+ covers big builds with heavy integrations and security needs. Once you know which of these three you actually need, a quote stops feeling random. It becomes something you can check against real work.
Local Market Context
It helps to ground any cost conversation in Canada in what is actually true about that market, not assumptions borrowed from somewhere else. Canadian founders, especially in Toronto's fintech and AI-research scene, are used to distributed teams already given the country's own multi-timezone reality, lowering the friction of adding an India-based team. This is not a small detail to skip past. A good studio should be weaving it into how they scope your build, from your timeline to which risks are worth planning for early. Bring this up directly in your first call. The answer you get is a good sign of how much homework the studio has actually done.
What Actually Drives The Price
If you want to guess what ai automation will actually cost, stop counting screens and start asking about how many systems the automation reads from and writes to, and whether it needs RAG grounding over your own data That is where the real engineering hours go. Here is a simple example. A checkout screen looks the same in a design file whether it connects to a fake database or a real payment system with fraud checks. The screen took a designer one afternoon either way. But the engineering behind it can take a day, or it can take three weeks. This is exactly why two studios can quote very different numbers for what looks like the same feature list.
How We Scope And Build It
Process is easy to underrate until you have been burned by not having one. Before work starts on an AI Automation, there should be a real founder workshop, not a sales call dressed up as one. It should nail down priorities and what "done" actually looks like for version one. That clarity is what makes sprint-based delivery actually work. Weekly demos matter because they force the team to show real, working software on a fixed schedule. That makes it very hard for a project to quietly drift off course for a month without anyone noticing.
From brief to live product.
A five-phase delivery system that ensures your product ships fast, right, and built to scale.
Realistic Timeline
Timeline estimates for ai automation usually fall into three bands: 6 to 10 weeks for an MVP, 3 to 5 months for a fuller build, and 6-plus months once enterprise requirements come in. What pushes a project from one band to the next is rarely the core features. It is the dependencies around them. Integrations with outside systems add real uncertainty, since you are waiting on someone else's system to behave as promised. Compliance requirements add review cycles that sit outside your development team's control. And building for two platforms from day one roughly doubles the testing work, not just adds to it.
Working With A Remote Team
The real worry with remote teams is almost never the work itself. It is whether you will actually know what is happening day to day, especially across time zones. The fix is not forcing overlapping hours. It is building communication that does not need them. A working demo every week, so you always see real software, not a status update. Clear notes on decisions as they happen, so nothing depends on someone's memory weeks later. And async handoffs, so the team keeps moving your project forward while you are offline. This approach often beats same-timezone teams, because it forces clear writing that in-person teams often skip.
The Risk Of Going Cheap
There is a pattern worth knowing before you pick the cheapest quote for ai automation. The savings almost always come from somewhere specific, even if nobody says so. Usually it is QA that gets thinned out first, real testing swapped for a quick check before shipping. Post-launch support goes next, often cut to a short window that does not cover the small fixes every real launch needs. And the experience level of the team doing the work tends to drop too. None of this shows up as a clear line item in a proposal. It shows up months later, as slow fixes and recurring bugs.
You have read the ranges. Here is what actually matters. Your project is not ₹30,000–80,000 or ₹8–20 lakh+, it is a specific thing with specific needs. The only way to know where it lands is to tell us about it. That is really all a scoping call is. No pitch deck, no pressure, just us listening to what you are trying to build and giving you a real number back.
AI-Powered
Apps That Think Faster

We embed AI natively, not as a feature, but as the foundation your product is built on.

AI is not a feature we add at the end, it's the foundation we build from. Every MojoStudios product is designed to be intelligent, adaptive, and faster than what your competitors can ship.
THIS MEANS
- Smarter apps that learn from users
- Reduced manual workflows by 80%+
- Competitive moat that grows over time
An MVP typically costs ₹30,000–80,000, a mid-complexity build runs ₹1.5–4 lakh, and an enterprise-grade version costs ₹8–20 lakh+. Exact pricing depends on scope, we scope it for free before any commitment.
Tech Capabilities Powering Our Solutions
Built on proven frameworks, modern stacks, and tools trusted by global teams
