Cost of a Android Native (Kotlin)
social media app.
Quick answer: a social media app built with Android Native (Kotlin) costs ₹1.5–3 lakh for an MVP, ₹6–12 lakh for a mid-complexity build, and ₹25–45 lakh+ for an enterprise version. Close to the cross-platform baseline for a single platform, but device-fragmentation testing (screen sizes, OS versions, manufacturer skins) adds real QA time.
I know you want to build a Android Native (Kotlin) social media app.
There are 10 lakh+ agencies, 5 crore+ vibe coders, and 1 crore+ developers out there right now. You found this page anyway. That's not an accident, we're still the best of all of them at what we do.
We're Sachin and Arjav. We started this studio together, and we still personally work on every project that comes in. When you reach out, it's one of us who replies, not a support team. And we'll say it straight: bring us your toughest deadline or the idea three other agencies said no to, that's exactly where we do our best work. We're Indian founders too, so don't stress about the budget upfront, tell us what you've got on a call and we'll figure out what fits.
Forget the price tag for a second.
Tell me your actual budget, not what you think you're supposed to say, and I'll tell you honestly what we can build in it. No stretch quote, no upsell.
Media/video storage at scale and real-time chat infrastructure.
A reasonable choice if you're launching Android-only first in an Android-dominant market like India, with iOS planned later.
Founders looking at Android Native (Kotlin) for a Social Media App usually want one number, but the honest answer is a range, and it depends on what "done" means for your version. ₹1.5–3 lakh gets you a working MVP with the core flow working end to end. ₹6–12 lakh covers a production build with the extra features that turn a demo into something people keep using. ₹25–45 lakh+ is where you land once uptime guarantees or access controls enter the picture. Android only It is a real part of why these numbers sit where they do, and it is one of the first decisions worth locking down before development starts, not renegotiating halfway through.
There is a reason Android Native (Kotlin) keeps coming up for a Social Media App. A reasonable choice if you're launching Android-only first in an Android-dominant market like India, with iOS planned later. On paper that is a general point, but for this category it shows up in a very real way. Some categories barely touch what makes a stack special. A simple content app runs fine on almost anything. social media app is not that simple. It has enough real interaction and data work that the stack choice actually shows up in the finished product, not just the build timeline. The real test is this: does this category lean on the stack's real strengths, or is the fit mostly about convenience? For this pairing, it leans on the former.
What Actually Drives The Price
There is a pattern in how social media app projects go over budget, and it almost always traces back to this being underestimated at the start: Media/video storage at scale and real-time chat infrastructure. It rarely looks like a red flag early on. It gets mentioned in passing, treated as a small detail to figure out later. But it has a big effect on the real engineering work, because it touches data design, integrations, and testing all at once. A useful check: if a proposal does not talk about this with real specifics, it is not really scoped yet, no matter how detailed the feature list looks.
How We Scope And Build It
There is a real difference between studios that scope a Social Media App properly and ones that just estimate it. The good ones run a founder workshop before writing a proposal, digging into edge cases and integrations that never show up in an early feature list. That output becomes the sprint plan for the Android Native (Kotlin) build, split into short cycles that each end in something you can actually demo, a working screen, not a progress report. Weekly demos are not a courtesy. They force both sides to face gaps between the plan and reality every week, not at the end. A senior engineer should own the architecture decisions in the first few sprints, since those choices are the hardest to reverse later.
Startup Speed.
Enterprise Grade.
One studio. Your Vision.
Full-stack pod, embedded in your team
Designers, engineers, and product thinkers, all speaking your language from day one.
Zero hand-holding, maximum ownership
We take the brief and run. You get weekly demos and working software, not status updates.
Design & engineering, no silos
One team thinks in pixels and code simultaneously. Faster decisions, zero handoff friction.
Async-first, timezone-resilient delivery
Our delivery structure keeps your product moving, regardless of where your team is.
Proven from seed stage to Series C
We've shipped MVPs in 6 weeks and rebuilt platforms for thousands of enterprise users.
Realistic Timeline
A realistic timeline for a Social Media App on Android Native (Kotlin) looks like 6 to 10 weeks for an MVP, 12 to 20 weeks for a full mid-complexity build, and 20 to 36-plus weeks at enterprise scale. The gap between these tiers is almost never about UI work, which is usually the fastest part of the build. It is backend complexity, integration depth, and compliance requirements that actually eat the calendar. Platform count matters too. Android only decides how much of the engineering work is genuinely shared versus redone per platform, and that shows up directly in the schedule.
Technical Tradeoffs Worth Knowing
Building social media app on Android Native (Kotlin) forces a few real engineering decisions early, and getting them right shapes how the product performs long after launch. State management is the first one, how well data stays in sync across screens that update on their own, especially anywhere the app shows live information. Offline behavior is the second, whether the app needs to work fully without internet, or a simple "you are offline" message is fine. Then there is the question of how much needs direct access to device features versus how much can live in shared code. None of these are small concerns for this category. They become real architecture decisions in the first two sprints, and changing them later is expensive.
The Risk Of Going Cheap
A suspiciously low quote for a Social Media App on Android Native (Kotlin) is rarely a sign of efficiency. It is a sign that something important got left out of scope, and it is worth asking directly what that is before signing. The most common cut is QA depth, testing on one device and calling it done, instead of testing across the real range of devices your users actually have. The second is post-launch support, quietly reduced to "we will fix critical bugs" with no clear window or response time. The third, and most costly, is senior engineering time, swapped for junior developers with limited oversight on decisions that are hardest to reverse later.
Ranges are a starting point, not an answer. Your version of a Social Media App on Android Native (Kotlin) is a specific thing, shaped by this: Media/video storage at scale and real-time chat infrastructure. The only way to price that accurately is to talk it through with someone who will actually build it. That is us. Free call, no pitch, no pressure. Bring the messy, half-formed version of your idea, that is completely normal, and it is exactly what we are good at untangling.
AI-Powered
Apps That Think Faster
We embed AI natively, not as a feature, but as the foundation your product is built on.
AI is not a feature we add at the end, it's the foundation we build from. Every MojoStudios product is designed to be intelligent, adaptive, and faster than what your competitors can ship.
THIS MEANS
- Smarter apps that learn from users
- Reduced manual workflows by 80%+
- Competitive moat that grows over time
An MVP typically costs ₹1.5–3 lakh, a mid-complexity build runs ₹6–12 lakh, and an enterprise-grade version costs ₹25–45 lakh+. Close to the cross-platform baseline for a single platform, but device-fragmentation testing (screen sizes, OS versions, manufacturer skins) adds real QA time.
Tech Capabilities Powering Our Solutions
Built on proven frameworks, modern stacks, and tools trusted by global teams
