iOS only

Cost of a iOS Native (Swift)
erp app.

Quick answer: a erp app built with iOS Native (Swift) costs ₹1.5–3 lakh for an MVP, ₹6–14 lakh for a mid-complexity build, and ₹30–60 lakh+ for an enterprise version. Roughly 15–25% above the cross-platform baseline, since there's no shared engineering effort with Android.

I know you want to build a iOS Native (Swift) erp app.

There are 10 lakh+ agencies, 5 crore+ vibe coders, and 1 crore+ developers out there right now. You found this page anyway. That's not an accident, we're still the best of all of them at what we do.

We're Sachin and Arjav. We started this studio together, and we still personally work on every project that comes in. When you reach out, it's one of us who replies, not a support team. And we'll say it straight: bring us your toughest deadline or the idea three other agencies said no to, that's exactly where we do our best work. We're Indian founders too, so don't stress about the budget upfront, tell us what you've got on a call and we'll figure out what fits.

WhatsApp
Email
MVP₹1.5–3 lakh
Mid-Complexity₹6–14 lakh
Enterprise₹30–60 lakh+

Forget the price tag for a second.

Tell me your actual budget, not what you think you're supposed to say, and I'll tell you honestly what we can build in it. No stretch quote, no upsell.

Try me, I'll build it in your budget
What drives erp app cost

Cost compounds across modules, inventory, finance, HR, and procurement each carry their own data model.

Why iOS Native (Swift) specifically

Worth it for apps leaning on brand-new Apple platform features on day one, or performance-critical graphics/AR work.

What's included at MVP tier
2–3 core modules
Single location
Basic reporting
Core approval workflow

For a Custom ERP Software built on iOS Native (Swift), the numbers break into three honest tiers. ₹1.5–3 lakh gets you a working MVP that proves the core idea. ₹6–14 lakh once you add the features that make it genuinely usable at scale. ₹30–60 lakh+ once compliance, integrations, and uptime guarantees become part of the deal. iOS only It changes how much engineering time goes into the plumbing versus the actual features. Most founders make the mistake of anchoring on one number from a competitor's website, without knowing which tier that number describes. The real work happens before the first sprint, when the tier and its limits get written down.

Worth it for apps leaning on brand-new Apple platform features on day one, or performance-critical graphics/AR work. That is the general case for iOS Native (Swift). The more useful question is whether it holds for a Custom ERP Software specifically, and mostly it does. Categories differ a lot in how much they depend on deep platform integration versus staying consistent across devices, and that difference should drive the stack decision more than habit or hype. For this category, the balance tips toward strengths this stack is genuinely good at, which is why experienced teams keep choosing it here. It is worth checking this reasoning against your own feature list rather than accepting it blindly. A studio that has shipped this category before should point to specific features where the stack choice actually mattered.

What Actually Drives The Price

If you want to know why one custom erp software quote comes in at half the price of another, here is the single factor that moves the price more than anything else: Cost compounds across modules, inventory, finance, HR, and procurement each carry their own data model. Two products in this category can share a name and a similar feature list while needing very different amounts of engineering work, because one keeps this part simple and the other does not. Here is a real example. Two teams scope what looks like the same app, but one quietly assumes the simple version while the other needs a much more complex version of the same requirement. That gap alone can add weeks of work that never shows up on a feature list.

How We Scope And Build It

There is a real difference between studios that scope a Custom ERP Software properly and ones that just estimate it. The good ones run a founder workshop before writing a proposal, digging into edge cases and integrations that never show up in an early feature list. That output becomes the sprint plan for the iOS Native (Swift) build, split into short cycles that each end in something you can actually demo, a working screen, not a progress report. Weekly demos are not a courtesy. They force both sides to face gaps between the plan and reality every week, not at the end. A senior engineer should own the architecture decisions in the first few sprints, since those choices are the hardest to reverse later.

Startup Speed.
Enterprise Grade.
One studio. Your Vision.

Full-stack pod, embedded in your team

Designers, engineers, and product thinkers, all speaking your language from day one.

Zero hand-holding, maximum ownership

We take the brief and run. You get weekly demos and working software, not status updates.

Design & engineering, no silos

One team thinks in pixels and code simultaneously. Faster decisions, zero handoff friction.

Async-first, timezone-resilient delivery

Our delivery structure keeps your product moving, regardless of where your team is.

Proven from seed stage to Series C

We've shipped MVPs in 6 weeks and rebuilt platforms for thousands of enterprise users.

3D Space Planet

Realistic Timeline

Timeline estimates for a Custom ERP Software on iOS Native (Swift) should land around 6 to 10 weeks for MVP, 12 to 20 weeks for a mid-complexity production build, and 20-plus weeks for enterprise scope. But honestly, the tier matters less than three variables that actually control the calendar. Platform count, since iOS only decides how much engineering work is shared across platforms versus duplicated. Backend complexity, how much custom logic the product needs versus what can be handled by well-tested services. And compliance, since anything touching regulated data adds review cycles that cannot be rushed by adding more engineers.

Technical Tradeoffs Worth Knowing

custom erp software built on iOS Native (Swift) runs into the same handful of trade-offs that separate a solid build from a fragile one. First, state management, and specifically how well the app keeps data consistent across screens when something changes elsewhere in real time. Second, offline support, which is either a real architecture requirement baked into how data is stored, or a lower priority that should not distort the rest of the build. Third, how much of the feature set depends on direct device access versus shared app logic, since that ratio affects both timeline and how much platform-specific debugging the team faces later. Naming these clearly during scoping avoids expensive rework mid-project.

The Risk Of Going Cheap

There is a reason cheap quotes for a Custom ERP Software on iOS Native (Swift) tend to cause expensive problems later. The savings almost always come from cutting something that does not show up until after launch. Cross-platform QA is easiest to skip quietly, since a demo on one device looks the same whether or not the app was tested on the other five setups your users actually have. Post-launch support gets the same treatment, vaguely promised, rarely defined, and often gone once the invoice is paid. And architecture decisions that should involve a senior engineer get made by whoever is available instead, which is fine until a decision made in week one slows down a new feature by three times.

Here is the thing about every number on this page. It is honest, and it is still not your number. Your number depends on this: Cost compounds across modules, inventory, finance, HR, and procurement each carry their own data model. It also depends on what you are building on top of versus from scratch, and on decisions only you can make. We would love to help you make them. Reach out, it costs nothing, and even if you build with someone else, you will leave the call knowing more than you do right now.

AI-Powered
Apps That Think Faster

AI Workflows Gradient Mobile
At MojoStudios,

We embed AI natively, not as a feature, but as the foundation your product is built on.

AI Robot Assistant Working on Laptop

AI is not a feature we add at the end, it's the foundation we build from. Every MojoStudios product is designed to be intelligent, adaptive, and faster than what your competitors can ship.

THIS MEANS

  • Smarter apps that learn from users
  • Reduced manual workflows by 80%+
  • Competitive moat that grows over time
Common Questions

An MVP typically costs ₹1.5–3 lakh, a mid-complexity build runs ₹6–14 lakh, and an enterprise-grade version costs ₹30–60 lakh+. Roughly 15–25% above the cross-platform baseline, since there's no shared engineering effort with Android.

Tech Capabilities Powering Our Solutions

Built on proven frameworks, modern stacks, and tools trusted by global teams

Python
Next.js
PyTorch
TensorFlow
PostgreSQL
Oracle
Apache
Selenium
MongoDB
MySQL
Elasticsearch
Redis
Magento
Prometheus
Laravel
Svelte
Python
Next.js
PyTorch
TensorFlow
PostgreSQL
Oracle
Apache
Selenium
MongoDB
MySQL
Elasticsearch
Redis
Magento
Prometheus
Laravel
Svelte
Python
Next.js
PyTorch
TensorFlow
PostgreSQL
Oracle
Apache
Selenium
MongoDB
MySQL
Elasticsearch
Redis
Magento
Prometheus
Laravel
Svelte
GraphQL
Vite
Paperclip
Cypress
GitHub
Slack
Grafana
Framer
CSS3
HTML5
Angular
React
.NET
Java
FastAPI
MySQL
GraphQL
Vite
Paperclip
Cypress
GitHub
Slack
Grafana
Framer
CSS3
HTML5
Angular
React
.NET
Java
FastAPI
MySQL
GraphQL
Vite
Paperclip
Cypress
GitHub
Slack
Grafana
Framer
CSS3
HTML5
Angular
React
.NET
Java
FastAPI
MySQL
Ready to build?

Get an exact quote, free.

Start a project